Ethical Situations
What does the patient have the right to know?
What the patient has the right to know (regarding genetic tests) is: a complicated matter and many people, including experts, have varying opinions. The information patients receive from genetic testing can have significant consequences, especially if it leads a pregnant woman to have an abortion. The ethical principles that arise in situations like this are varied and are often in conflict with each other. The ethical decisions in genetic counseling would be fairly cut and dry if the principle of autonomy was the only one that was considered. However, by doing this a counselor may be ignoring the other ethical concerns like: what is best for society and being fair to other people (regarding who the patient's decisions are affecting).
Who should have decision making power in our society on issues of genetic / medical testing?
Regarding the "Dwarfism Case," Alexander Capron believes that allowing this woman to abort the healthy child based on the genetic test is wrong. As, this would be no different than: aborting a baby (because it's not the desired sex). He also states that, "While a woman has a right under Roe v. Wade to abort for whatever reasons convince her, is: more important than the patient's autonomy. This is because killing the fetus would be: ethically wrong, unnecessarily cruel, and unjust. However, Rosalie Goldberg and Eugene Pergament believe that a patient should indeed have the right to make that decision, regardless of whether it is an entitlement or not (68).
It should be pointed out the Caplan is a Sociologist and Goldberg as well as Pergament are Genetic Counselors / Geneticists. This leads naturally to the question of who should have decision making power regarding genetic testing issues. Personally, I agree with Capron that full patient autonomy is a dangerous thing. I would view it as: morally and ethically wrong to carry out the test in the Dwarfism Case. This is because I know that it would result in the abortion of a perfectly healthy fetus. I would further submit that there is something wrong with two parents who cannot accept a healthy child. The reason why is: it will not end up being like them physically. I also feel that Pergament and Goldberg would be unethical for: allowing this patient full autonomy.
Do other people (besides the patient) have the right to know the information if it affects them?
Yes. The experts all agreed…
107) could also apply here. The confidentiality clause in such a case then only applies insofar as it is estimated that there is no need to disclose confidential information to others. In the case of Mrs. Z, her family deserves to know about her situation, because it affects their lives pertinently. Because of the increasing cultural diversity throughout the world, cultural values also play an important part in making ethical
Ethics, Values and Decision-Making in Nursing Practice RIGHT FROM WRONG A nurse's primary tasks are monitoring the patient's vital signs, administering medications, and helping doctors treat and perform procedures (Williams, 2012). Oftentimes and in many cases, these technical skills must be guided by certain and pertinent moral and ethical principles. This ethical and moral component of her overall responsibility is so important and critical that a code of ethics was created by
Ethics The employee is faced with ethical requirements throughout their workday that must be met with knowledge and a trained attitude. Workplace ethics is one of the most crucial elements whether the person involved in an ethical dilemma is a high-level manager or an entry-level employee. An ethical stance is important because it is what guides the interactions that the employees will have with each other, their management, and the customers
The conflict arises with the sharing of the information that could be disclosed to other colleagues. In one aspect there is a duty to confidentiality. While at the same time, providing the details of the conversation will help to improve treatment options. The challenge is determining if this information should be disclosed. This situation is unethical by violating the confidentiality of the patient through discussing the conversation. It is
Ethical issues are now just as much of a concern as they were thirty years or more ago. (Qian, Gao, Yao & Rodriguez) Ethics are a clear set of principles dealing with what is considered appropriate behavior in-group and individual counseling. These standards were created not only to protect clients, but also to protect counselors. As a counselor, a fine line can easily be crossed if the counselor and/or the
Walker and Clark propose active use of clinical supervision through facilitation, rather than directive approaches and discuss ten cues of seemingly insignificant acts that may lead to problems, such as gift-giving, sale of goods, self-disclosure on the part of the counselor, touching and sex. Interventions are made by risk managers when these cues are detected (1999, p. 1435-1439). Perhaps this is the solution, but problems will still occur, as
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now